Professor profile for Louis Waldman

Have you taken a course taught by Louis Waldman?
Contribute to UTLife by writing a Review!

Student reviews of Louis Waldman

Review from a student who took arh 364
I'm convinced he could make anyone want to be an art history major. I found him to be a wealth of knowledge - his interests are vast and he incorporates them into his teaching. Never boring. He's extremely easy to talk to and is more than willing to help his students.
Review from a student who took ARH 364
Prof. Waldman was the best teacher I had in 4 years of college! He is funny, energetic and interesting. He makes 1 1/2 seem like 20 minutes. You feel bad for missing his class because he is so fun. He is also very approachable and is great help on papers. He is not intimidating and makes you feel smart. He by far is the most fun I have had at UT! Everyone should take him for any of his Renaissance Art classes no matter what your major... you will have a blast!
Review from a student who took ARH 303
It's clear that he truly wants students to be interested in the subject and to be able to appreciate art. There are weekly reading assignments that are pretty light, and (of course) it helps a bunch to read before lecture. Grading is based on lecture AND discussion attendance, 3 tests, and two papers. Tests are painting identification and discussion, fill-in-the blank vocabulary, and essay. You MUST attend lecture, not only because he takes attendance, but because he will also bring things up in lecture that are not in the readings. Take good notes. Also, he likes students to participate in class. Although I probably have a minority opinion, sometimes I found him a little patronizing; I didn't like how he so blatantly incorporated his personal interpretation of history or opinions on current events into the lectures. While this didn't happen often, I felt that it happened enough to undermine the educational value of the lectures and were a bit disruptive, in that they caused him to go off onto excessively long (20 min) tangents instead of actually teaching us. Overall, I thought he was an all right teacher; the difficulty of the class is just right and the subject matter was pretty interesting. You will have to put a little effort in. Don't totally blow it off, and you might find that you actually enjoy some of it.

Grades given in courses taught by Louis Waldman

When teaching ARH 303

67%A
22%B
2%C
1%D
5%F
3%Drops
grade: a b c d f drops
percentage: 67% 22% 2% 1% 5% 3%

  All professors who have taught ARH 303

When teaching ARH 331L

72%A
16%B
3%C
3%D
2%F
4%Drops
grade: a b c d f drops
percentage: 72% 16% 3% 3% 2% 4%

  All professors who have taught ARH 331L

When teaching ARH 364

69%A
19%B
1%C
2%D
4%F
4%Drops
grade: a b c d f drops
percentage: 69% 19% 1% 2% 4% 4%

  All professors who have taught ARH 364

When teaching ARH 384

88%A
6%B
0%C
0%D
0%F
6%Drops
grade: a b c d f drops
percentage: 88% 6% 0% 0% 0% 6%

  All professors who have taught ARH 384

When teaching ARH 331K

68%A
24%B
3%C
1%D
4%F
1%Drops
grade: a b c d f drops
percentage: 68% 24% 3% 1% 4% 1%

  All professors who have taught ARH 331K

When teaching FS 118

95%A
0%B
0%C
0%D
0%F
5%Drops
grade: a b c d f drops
percentage: 95% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5%

  All professors who have taught FS 118